In neoliberal society, where workers are devalued, and under Theory X management generally, this is discouraged, but in any work situation, I'm driven to make improvements where I can. My impatience for idiocy reigns here.
Update, November 11, 2018: This entry has been changed since it was first published to include brief descriptions of anonymization and confidentiality among the ways that ethical research protects participants and to add that there is a lack of trust in the government to protect confidentiality.
Update, November 12, 2018: I have submitted my resignation to the U.S. Census Bureau. I am appending the text of my resignation to this entry.
I wanted to take note of the following:
Back when I was applying for the Ph.D. program in Transformative Studies at California Institute of Integral Studies, I was waiting for a phone call to be interviewed for that program.
The idea of 'theory' is pretty basic stuff taught in undergraduate methodology classes. We speak of a circular process, in which observations lead to a hypothesis, which is tested, with the results forming new observations and a refined or revised hypothesis eventually developing into and being recognized as a theory, but with the circular process continuing. This is part of the positivist paradigm but forms of it can be found in non-positivist approaches to inquiry. If there's any controversy about this, I'm unaware of it.
My thinking on threats to democracy is developing further in preparation for the Human Science Institute conference to be held this October.
While political dysfunction has soared under supposedly, but not really, unified Republican control of the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. government, the economy is widely reported to be doing well, thanks, allegedly, to the cautious policies of the previous administration.
The Human Science Institute conference is coming up in October this year and it looks like I might have something to present if, and this is a mighty big if right now, I can get it together in time. I do not know yet what the deadline will be for abstracts. I actually won't have to travel very far for this one, as it looks like it will be held in Berkeley, which makes it a lot easier, especially financially. According to the blurb I received,
It is probably easiest to begin this with a passage from the essay I wrote for my practicum (at a point when I thought my dissertation would be a theoretical dissertation):
Thomas Frank (October 4, 2012) describes the objections of wealthy financiers to being vilified for the financial crisis that began in 2007: